Sir
A few question to MR.kher who have some doubts and questions for my theory of earthquake prediction
(1) Does moon force depend on the body it is acting?
(2) How such a small force produce 4.5 mtrs of high tide in the oceans?
(3) can we observe high tide and low tides in a bucket full of water? why ?
(4) Does mass and volume of molten lava is more than that of waters in the oceans?
Now some questions to Plate Tectonics
(1) Why there are quakes at other than plate boundaries?
(2) How and why the initial two plates ie Laurasia and Gondwanaland
separated initially ? Due to heat currents or Due to Earth rotation?
Because magma will not solidify at the places where splitting forces are already there how did they separated ?
(1)Why there are major quakes allover the globe ,on different plate on a given date?
(2) Why some months are prone to major natural disasters Like May 2008?
(3)Why some of the major quakes have occured onf
full moon or new moon day. BOth Latur(30-09-1993) and Bhuj 26-01-2001)quakes are on full moon day
(4) How does plate tectonics explains pre shocks ?
Amit J Dave
Hi
On one of press note in daily DNA ,My article earthquake prediction appeared on June 3,2008.
One gentleman from Pune ,India raised strong doubts on my earlier prediction of MAY 2008,includining the great china quake pf May 12.
Now here ,I woud like to be more specific and give time for the quakes
1. 8th September 2008------0150 IsT or2020GMT 7th September
2. 10th September 2008 ------1950 GMT
3. 15th September 2008 ----0910 GMT
4. 16Th September 2008 -----2015 GMT
I would like each and every one to observe/watch these dates carefully for major quakes all over the globe
pl----pl---pl dont treat this as an astrological and unscientific blog. This may save some lives
A.j.Dave
On one of press note in daily DNA ,My article earthquake prediction appeared on June 3,2008.
One gentleman from Pune ,India raised strong doubts on my earlier prediction of MAY 2008,includining the great china quake pf May 12.
Now here ,I woud like to be more specific and give time for the quakes
1. 8th September 2008------0150 IsT or2020GMT 7th September
2. 10th September 2008 ------1950 GMT
3. 15th September 2008 ----0910 GMT
4. 16Th September 2008 -----2015 GMT
I would like each and every one to observe/watch these dates carefully for major quakes all over the globe
pl----pl---pl dont treat this as an astrological and unscientific blog. This may save some lives
A.j.Dave
Hi
Here are some more dates to be observed carefully for major earthquakes (more than 7.0 on Richter scale0 in the month of September 2008. these dates are also prone to other natural disasters like cyclones and heavy down pour.
1. 8th sept 2008
2. 10 th sept 2008
3. 15/16 th sept 2008
regards
A.J.DAVE
Here are some more dates to be observed carefully for major earthquakes (more than 7.0 on Richter scale0 in the month of September 2008. these dates are also prone to other natural disasters like cyclones and heavy down pour.
1. 8th sept 2008
2. 10 th sept 2008
3. 15/16 th sept 2008
regards
A.J.DAVE
Hi. This is just to warn you that thanks to this blog's high rankings and incoming links, most posts have been infested with comment spam. So, when you open a post that shows you a large number of comments, please be be warned that the very large number of links in the spam comments will make the page very slow to load, and cause it to scroll down interminably. In extreme cases, your browser could show script errors, crash or even hang your machine.
Unfortunately, Blogger makes it easier to comment-spam than it does to delete the darn things. We don't have the time to delete this crap comment by comment, though we do try and clean up in small bursts. Until we do, this post will stay up as a warning.
Should you wish to contact any of the blog team, please scroll down to the "contributors" section in the sidebar and click through to their pages, where some may have contact info listed, or click on from there to their blogs, where you can leave a comment.
While this blog is no longer kept updated, it has been left online as a historical record and an aid to researchers and academics. The group blogs about ongoing disaster relief efforts all over the world at World Wide Help, and has a newsgroup and even a Facebook Group you can join.
Thank you.
Unfortunately, Blogger makes it easier to comment-spam than it does to delete the darn things. We don't have the time to delete this crap comment by comment, though we do try and clean up in small bursts. Until we do, this post will stay up as a warning.
Should you wish to contact any of the blog team, please scroll down to the "contributors" section in the sidebar and click through to their pages, where some may have contact info listed, or click on from there to their blogs, where you can leave a comment.
While this blog is no longer kept updated, it has been left online as a historical record and an aid to researchers and academics. The group blogs about ongoing disaster relief efforts all over the world at World Wide Help, and has a newsgroup and even a Facebook Group you can join.
Thank you.
An earthquake with a magnitude of 3.9 occurred about 4 miles north of Fontana. It struck at 1:22 a.m. Local time on March 9, 2008. An aftershock measuring 3.1 occurred about a minute later.
A quake of this size is not expected to cause damage or injuries. It was widely felt throughout the Inland Empire, Riverside and parts of Los Angeles and Orange counties.
Quakes in this area are not uncommon. A 4.4 in January of 2005 was preceded by several smaller foreshocks.
LOCATION MAP (click to enlarge):
A quake of this size is not expected to cause damage or injuries. It was widely felt throughout the Inland Empire, Riverside and parts of Los Angeles and Orange counties.
Quakes in this area are not uncommon. A 4.4 in January of 2005 was preceded by several smaller foreshocks.
LOCATION MAP (click to enlarge):
A strong 6.0-magnitude earthquake struck a sparsely-populated region of northern Nevada on Thursday, damaging buildings and rupturing water and gas mains. Fortunately there were no serious injuries reported.
Here is a wide view of the immediate area followed by a closer view (click to enlarge).
Here is a wide view of the immediate area followed by a closer view (click to enlarge).
NEWS REPORT
QUAKE FOOTAGE
A lot of people ask why the clips in this video stop just as the shaking starts. The reason is because the electricity went out and the recordings stopped.
The sequence of earthquakes coming out of Northern Baja is quite impressive and is not showing any signs of slowing down. It resembles an aftershock sequence you might see after a 6+ earthquake. But there was no 6+ earthquake. In fact, the quake which started this was only a 5.4.
The quake was originally posted as a 5.4 and later downgraded to a 5.1. There is still some debate over the true magnitude of this quake. It will take some time to determine the actual magnitude. It should be somewhere between 5.1 and 5.5.
As of the time of this report the 5.4 quake has been followed by at least 35 aftershocks with a magnitude of 3.0 or greater. Five have been greater than 4.0 and two have been 5.0 or greater. In total there have been over 200 aftershocks.
How does this compare with previous quakes in the area? Data from previous years shows that in May of 2006 a 5.4 earthquake produced 16 aftershocks of 3.0 or greater. In February of 2002 a 5.7 quake in the same area produced nearly fifty 3.0+ aftershocks.
The question that I'm sure everyone is asking is whether something bigger and more destructive is on the way. Nobody can say for sure. The 5.7 quake in 2002 was preceded by increased seismic activity which started in December of 2001.
It is always best to be prepared. Plan as if a stronger quake is on the way. Make sure you are prepared by having a supply of bottled water and non-perishable food. Always sleep with a pair of shoes and a flash light near your bed. Make sure there are no loose items or furniture that could fall and hurt someone.
It's a good idea to always be prepared. The mainshock is usually the largest and most destructive, and waiting until after the mainshock to get prepared is a bad idea.
Here is a link for more tips on how to prepare for an earthquake and what to do after one strikes.ALWAYS BE PREPARED
Here is our latest image showing the region affected by these quakes (click on it to enlarge):
The quake was originally posted as a 5.4 and later downgraded to a 5.1. There is still some debate over the true magnitude of this quake. It will take some time to determine the actual magnitude. It should be somewhere between 5.1 and 5.5.
As of the time of this report the 5.4 quake has been followed by at least 35 aftershocks with a magnitude of 3.0 or greater. Five have been greater than 4.0 and two have been 5.0 or greater. In total there have been over 200 aftershocks.
How does this compare with previous quakes in the area? Data from previous years shows that in May of 2006 a 5.4 earthquake produced 16 aftershocks of 3.0 or greater. In February of 2002 a 5.7 quake in the same area produced nearly fifty 3.0+ aftershocks.
The question that I'm sure everyone is asking is whether something bigger and more destructive is on the way. Nobody can say for sure. The 5.7 quake in 2002 was preceded by increased seismic activity which started in December of 2001.
It is always best to be prepared. Plan as if a stronger quake is on the way. Make sure you are prepared by having a supply of bottled water and non-perishable food. Always sleep with a pair of shoes and a flash light near your bed. Make sure there are no loose items or furniture that could fall and hurt someone.
It's a good idea to always be prepared. The mainshock is usually the largest and most destructive, and waiting until after the mainshock to get prepared is a bad idea.
Here is a link for more tips on how to prepare for an earthquake and what to do after one strikes.ALWAYS BE PREPARED
Here is our latest image showing the region affected by these quakes (click on it to enlarge):
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)