Showing posts with label earthquakes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label earthquakes. Show all posts

2011 Southern California Earthquakes

10 Most recent 3.0+ earthquakes in Southern California

updated: 03/17/11 08:03 PM (West Coast Time)

MAG DATE LOCAL TIME LOCATION DEPTH (KM)
3.13/17/201110:30 AM17 WNW Pinnacles, CA7.9
3.43/17/201110:18 AM14 NW Pinnacles, CA5.8
3.03/16/201110:55 PM5 NE San Simeon, CA2.1
3.33/15/201112:15 AM36 SW Ensenada, MX7.0
3.63/13/201111:30 PM54 SSE Calexico, CA10.0
3.43/10/20118:51 PM16 NNW Tehachapi, CA5.4
3.23/10/20117:56 AM17 N Searles Valley, CA4.7
3.23/9/20115:55 AM36 SSE Calexico, CA10.0
3.03/8/20118:17 PM1 N Big Bear City, CA6.7
3.13/8/201112:46 PM13 WSW Calexico, CA12.9
MORE 2011 QUAKES
Previous Years

Small Quakes Rattle Watsonville

UPDATED: 7/2/07

A new 4.3 quake has been reported in this area. CLICK HERE for our special report.

Residents in Watsonville were shaken by a series of small quakes late this afternoon. The three quakes, measuring 3.0, 3.2 and 3.0, all occurred within 15 minutes of each other.

The earthquakes were felt within the Watsonville and surrounding communities. The shaking has been described as a gentle rumbling ending in a sharp jolt.

If you felt this earthquake and would like to share your story (or read other accounts), please check our message board.

Be sure to check out our 2007 quake map to see other Northern California quakes in 2007. Our list of previous years quakes can be found on the right side of our web site.

Earthquakes Continue in Northern Oregon

The area between Kent, Oregon and Maupin, Oregon has seen steady quake activity since December of 2006. The quakes have been in a concentrated area about 8 miles ESE of Maupin.

Most of the quakes are small and have not been felt. Quakes of this size usually go unnoticed by most. However, this sequence, now in its seventh month, has raised eyebrows because this kind of consistent quake activity has never been recorded in this location.

On Thursday afternoon, the strongest quake of the sequence was recorded. The 3.9 quake was the strongest in the region since a 4.2 earthquake in November of 1976.

CLICK HERE to view a special report showing all quakes in the area since 1976.

6.8 Earthquake off the Coast of Guatemala

The following is a release by the United States Geological Survey, National Earthquake Information Center: An earthquake occurred 115 km (70 miles) SSW of GUATEMALA CITY, Guatemala at 1:29 PM MDT, Jun 13, 2007 (1:29 PM local time in Guatemala). The magnitude and location may be revised when additional data and further analysis results are available. No reports of damage or casualties have been received at this time; however, this earthquake may have caused damage due to its location and size.

------------
From the Associated Press
1:43 PM PDT, June 13, 2007



GUATEMALA CITY -- A powerful earthquake shook Guatemala on today, U.S. seismologists said, but there were no immediate reports of damage or injuries in the capital.

The magnitude 6.8 earthquake struck at 1:29 p.m. local time (3:29 p.m. EDT) and was centered 70 miles southwest of Guatemala City off the Pacific coast, according to the U.S. Geological Survey.

Firefighters in Guatemala City said they had no immediate reports of injury or damage.

Radio Sonora reported that houses were damaged along the Pacific coast, with mudslides in several areas. But firefighters in several coastal communities, including Santa Rosa and Escluintla, told The Associated Press they had received no reports of damage.

The quake was felt in neighboring El Salvador, where people ran into the streets in the capital of San Salvador.

Carlos Lopez, a spokesman for the Red Cross in El Salvador, said there were no immediate reports of major damage in that country.

The region is prone to earthquakes. One of Guatemala's most devastating quakes was in 1976 when nearly 23,000 people died.

----------------------------------

This report will be updated as new information is received

Here are two maps showing the location. The first is a wide view, the second a closer view. (click on image full size image)

Moderate Quake Near Mammoth Lakes

Aftershocks continue after a 4.6 earthquake shook the Sierra Nevada Mountains in Central California early Tuesday morning. The quake struck just after 12:20am (Pacific Coast time). So far there have been more than 160 aftershocks. Four of the aftershocks have been 3.0 or higher, with the largest being 3.6. The quake was preceeded by a 3.6 foreshock.

Hundreds of people throughout central California and Western Nevada have reported feeling the quake. Some of the stronger aftershocks have been felt by people in the vicinity of the epicenter.

The map here shows the area affected by this series of earthquakes.

This region of the Sierra Nevada's is very familiar with earthquakes. The last strong quake to register above 5.0 was back on May 15, 1999. When the area experienced a 5.6 quake. Even stronger damaging quakes ocurred in 1980.

Explore our Northern California historical Quake maps located on the right side of our website to see quakes in this area over the years.

3.5 Aftershock West of Frazier Park



Tuesday's 3.5 earthquake was an aftershock to the 3.7 quake which shook the region early Monday morning. Both quakes, along with several smaller aftershocks, are occuring along a segment of the San Andreas fault near the Grapevine.

Anthony Guarino with the Southern California Seismic Network reports that this quake may have been felt in Valencia, Gorman, Castaic, and surrounding communities.

There were no reports of damage or injuries.

This map shows where these quakes occured in relation to the surrounding communties and it's proximity to the San Andreas fault. The orange quake on left is a 3.0 which occured on March 1st of this year.



A closer view of the quake area.

4.2 Quake Hits Southern California Desert

A quake with a preliminary magnitude of 4.2 struck the lower Southern California Desert Friday Night. The quake was widely felt from the deserts to the coast, and even reports that it was felt as far away as Phoenix Arizona, some 250 miles away. Nearly 2,000 felt reports were filed within the first hour of the quake.

If the felt reports are accurate, it's my experience that this quake's magnitude will be upgraded sometime soon.

Click on the picture above to see exactly where this quake struck, along with other quakes in the area that have occurred in 2007.

Earthquake Preparedness

The Los Angeles Fire Department published a great earthquake preparedness guide which they have made available on the Internet.

---------------

To those of us who live and work in the Greater Los Angeles area, earthquakes are a reality. In order to deal with this situation, earthquake preparedness must become a way of life. In the event of a major earthquake, freeways and surface streets may be impassable and public services could be interrupted or taxed beyond their limits. Therefore, everyone must know how to provide for their own needs for an extended period of time, whether at work, home or on the road.

Our goal in providing this information is to encourage you to prepare for a major earthquake and to maintain that readiness. Part of becoming ready is having the necessary supplies. Earthquakes, in our area, can happen at any time. They are not totally predictable. There are long periods between episodes. This is why it is important to maintain fresh emergency supplies through rotation of older stock into daily use. The quality of life and the potential for survival are greatly increased by being prepared.

William R. Bamattre
Chief Engineer and General Manager
Los Angeles City Fire Department

THE EARTHQUAKE PREPAREDNESS HANDBOOK

Remembering the 1999 Bolinas Earthquake

Written in August 1999 by JCP Seismologists

BOLINAS, CA -- Foundations rocked and rolled as far south as Santa Cruz County -- and shuddered sharply in Bolinas at the epicenter of one of the first significant earthquakes to strike the Bay Area since the Loma Prieta disaster nearly a decade ago. The temblor was felt thoughout much of the North Bay region.

Fortunately, the quake's size was fairly small, at magnitude 5.0. With the exception of a few emptied store shelves and a toppled chimney in the community of Bolinas, 15 miles northwest of San Francisco, there was little damage to speak of.

The shock struck north of the Golden Gate along the San Andreas fault zone near its intersection with the San Gregorio fault, which extends offshore southward from the Bolinas area. Although the San Andreas fault in this area is visited frequently by minor seismic activity, Tuesday's quake was one of the largest to occur along on this stretch of the fault since it ruptured here in the great San Francisco earthquake in 1906.

The U.S. Geological Survey forecast a 1-in-10 chance of strong and possibly damaging aftershocks in the Bolinas area during the week following Tuesday's quake.

Although this earthquake is insignificant in comparison to the disastrous magnitude 7.4 shock in Turkey just the day before, it may prove interesting for local scientists studying the likelihood of future earthquakes in the Bay Area.

The USGS and collaborating scientific agencies are currently updating their estimates of earthquake probability for the region's fault segments, one of which is the San Francisco Peninsula segment. This is a section of the San Andreas fault that extends from Los Gatos northwestward to the Bolinas area, and is immediately north of the Santa Cruz Mountains segment that ruptured in 1989 causing the Bay Area's most recent earthquake disaster.

In its magnitude of 5.0 and its location near the end of a San Andreas fault segment, Tuesday's jolt at Bolinas is not unlike two moderate quakes that closely preceded the Loma Prieta shock. Those events, of magnitude 5.3 and 5.4, occurred near Lake Elsman just south of Los Gatos, about 16 months and 2 months before the earthquake on October 17, 1989.

The Lake Elsman events struck where the northern end of the Santa Cruz Mountains segment and the southern end of the Peninsula segment meet. Their timing and location has led some scientists to regard the Lake Elsman quakes as "preshocks" to the subsequent magnitude 7.1 Loma Prieta rupture -- useful harbingers, if so, had they been recognized as such.

Is the Bolinas quake a preshock of a larger quake to come? On this question the jury hasn't yet had time to convene.

--------------------------
USGS Report

8/17/99 Magnitude 5 earthquake near Bolinas, CA

The magnitude 5 earthquake that occurred on Tuesday, August 17 at 6:06PM local time was located beneath Bolinas Lagoon in Marin County at a depth of about 4.2 miles. It was felt broadly throughout the San Francisco Bay Area and yielded instrumental records of shaking that reflect various ground conditions in the Bay Area.

The earthquake occurred along a stretch of the San Andreas fault that had more than 20 feet of slip in 1906 as indicated by offset fence lines. In contrast, Tuesday's event probably resulted in slip of a few cm on a small patch of fault at depth.

Scientists consider Tuesday's quake to be a small to moderate size event. It would take approximately 4000 such earthquakes to equal the energy released by the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake or 30,000 such earthquakes to equal the energy released in the magnitude 7.4 earthquake in Turkey which occurred on the same day.

The Bolinas earthquake is interesting to scientists for two reasons:
  • It occurred in a region that has had only one previous earthquake in the last 30 years of detailed seismic recording.

  • Information obtained from the earthquake waves indicate an up-down direction of slip not the sideways (or lateral) slip expected for the San Andreas fault.

The first observation was somewhat of a surprise. Much of the 300 mile length of the San Andreas fault that ruptured in 1906 (from San Juan Bautista to Cape Mendocino) is currently aseismic (relatively free of earthquakes) and has been since 1906. Scientists consider the San Andreas fault in Northern California to be in a "locked" part of its earthquake cycle.

The second observation suggests that, in detail, this earthquake probably was not on the San Andreas fault, but rather occurred on a small fault adjacent to the main fault at depth.
top